The ANH in collaboration with its US affiliate, the American Association for Health Freedom (AAHF), submitted on 5 January 2007, its consultation response to the US Food & Drugs Administration (FDA) on its current functional foods consultation and warns that the US should not copy restrictive European legislative models as consumers would otherwise be the likely big losers.
Natural health interests voice concern about possible new oversight by FDA on health claims The American Association for Health Freedom (AAHF), and its European affiliate, the Alliance for Natural Health (ANH), today submitted written comments to the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) in its current consultation on functional foods.
As leaders in the health freedom community, AAHF and the ANH recommend better definitions or adapting existing regulations on functional foods and not creating new regulations that could ultimately reduce consumer choice or information.
AAHF and the ANH argue that if additional oversight is to be considered, it must be proportionate, as there is a very real risk that if excessively onerous provisions are required to “authorize” health claims, many of the smaller companies, which have typically been the pioneers in this field, will be prevented from including health claims of any type on their products. These smaller companies would be at risk of losing valuable market share to multinational companies that can afford to pay their way into the new regulatory regime while potentially selling inferior products.
Instead, AAHF/ANH urges the FDA to contemplate a process that balances consumer choice and safety issues with compliance issues for companies. Brenna Hill, AAHF Executive Director said, “The FDA should not over-burden the industry or penalize educated consumers who are looking at reducing their risks from chronic diseases like heart disease and diabetes. Consumers have an exponentially greater interest in taking responsibility for their own health.” In fact, AAHF/ANH point out that functional foods have been in the marketplace since the 1960s and have been consumed safely for decades. Since several of the top 10 diseases in the US have been shown to be associated one way or another with diet it is imperative to make sure that consumers are both properly informed and that adequate food choices are available to them.
As Scientific Director of AAHF and Executive Director of ANH, Robert Verkerk
PhD, said, “The tight regulation of health claims has been prioritized in Europe and a
new regulation is about to be imposed, affecting Europe’s 450 million strong population. The regulation is in our view far too stringent, requiring a very high level of scientific substantiation including human clinical trials that would not be out of place in the field of drugs licensing.” AAHF and the ANH agree that it might be fine for the largest corporations in the functional food arena, but it’s impractical for the smaller companies which have generally produced the most advanced and innovative products. Verkerk adds, “We think it’s essential that the FDA doesn’t follow Europe on this issue, nor should it follow the developing international Codex guidelines, which are presently strongly paralleling European legislation.”Michael Ruggio, AAHF general counsel added, “Legally, the situation is complex, especially as it looks like the FDA might unwittingly create increasing legal uncertainty in this area.
"The sorts of provisions that the FDA appears to be contemplating in their bid for increasing oversight on health claims is likely to significantly narrow the gap between the legal requirements for getting foods and drugs onto the market. Consumers could be the big losers here, unless we see a very well thought out approach which doesn’t disadvantage the smaller players in the industry.”
Vitamin D recommendation for covid; Vaccine passport tug-or-war; Musk's spaceport threatens indigenous homelands; Ivermectin update; Natural immunity; Destress with a hot chocolate; Yes2Life cancer Congress;