By Rob Verkerk PhD, founder, executive & scientific director 

 

"It's like religion. Heresy [in science] is thought of as a bad thing, whereas it should be just the opposite."
- Dr. Thomas Gold, astrophysicist, member of US National Academy of Sciences, and Fellow of the Royal Society (London)

 

Being a scientist means keeping an open mind.

Sadly – one of the biggest casualties of the pandemic has been science. Politics and economics, both of which inexorably linked to establishing a new, authoritarian way of running planet Earth, seem to have got in the way.

I am deeply saddened by the fact that so many brilliant scientists and doctors have been side-lined in the name of maintaining allegedly ‘honest’, ‘transparent’ science. Especially when so much dishonest, distorted, manipulated, paid-for and corrupt science now tries to masquerade as real science. 

The Mikovits and Seneff firehose turned on by Mercola

As an open-minded scientist, it was with great pleasure that I dialled into Dr Joe Mercola’s interview of two scientists, the works of which I have long followed. Like Mercola himself, both scientists have been unfairly castigated by the mainstream media, significant parts of the scientific community, so-called ‘fact-checkers’, and other alleged misinformation exposers, such as the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCHD) (that seem to be experts in inciting hate). It was reassuring that CCHD’s report, that positioned Mercola in top spot among 12 of the leading, so-called 'anti-vaxxers' (labelled the “Disinformation Dozen”), was construed as carrying a “faulty narrative” by Facebook, itself a leading censor.

The two scientists interviewed by Mercola are none other than Judy Mikovits PhD and Stephanie Seneff PhD. To escape the censors, Mercola puts his content up for just 48 hours so by the time you read this it might have disappeared. But you can find the transcript and you might find the interview via an internet trawl. (Update: you can watch the interview here)

>>> Download transcript of Mercola interview of Mikovits and Seneff

In his preamble to the interview, Dr Mercola describes the interview as akin to “drinking from a firehose” and recommends you listen to it more than once to allow you to help absorb the pearls.

Interpreting the firehose’s output

While you can read the transcript (above), I wanted to pull out some of the key points that emerged in terms of their relevance to the very complex healthcare decision many people have already made, or are in the process of making, presenting these as best as I can in plain English. I have interpreted what I consider to be best science on the subject, perhaps placing a slightly different emphasis than that used by Drs Mikovits and Seneff, but talking to the very points they make in the interview.