-
Speak to your genes in a language they understand
19 February 2020
Our latest video brings to life some modern mimicry to make the most of our stone age genes and restore health and resilience
-
‘Altered Genes, Twisted Truth’ – the fraud exposed
04 March 2015
Rob Verkerk witnesses launch of new treatise exposing the scientific fraud on which the global trade of genetically modified foods is based
-
Speak to your genes in a language they understand
Our latest video brings to life some modern mimicry to make the most of our stone age genes and restore health and resilience
-
News Alerts: Week 51, 2015
16 December 2015
EU fails to ban ‘dirty six’, UK pollution limits, ‘farmaceutical’ drug for rare disease, group meditation and societal stress, obesity a ‘national threat’, French supermarkets waste food idea and genes determine sweetness
-
New Alerts: Week 41, 2015
07 October 2015
Probiotic win, Monsanto sued, no patents for BRCA1 genes , fats, and smart meters
-
The Great Health Reset
Regenerating health & care post pandemic. Find out how an entire nation’s approach to health & care could be made both resilient and sustainable for now and the future based on our UK-tailored blueprint
-
News Alerts: Week 49, 2016
07 December 2016
Urgent Action to prevent Integrative Care Centre closure; Plant foods good for gene expression; US organic standards to exclude GMO's; Emulsifiers increase risk of colon cancer; Good early life nutrition for stress protection; Vitamin D in pregnancy may reduce autism risk; Parkinson's link with the gut
-
Corporations don’t own your genes – but they can copy them
19 June 2013
Why did the Supreme Court ruling on gene patents cause biotech stocks to rise?
-
News Alerts: Week 13, 2018
28 March 2018
CAM trained GPs prescribe fewer antibiotics; Caloric Restriction slows ageing; Epigenetics and breast cancer risk; HPV trilogy “Sacrificial Virgins” wins another award
-
‘Cancer is down to bad luck, not genes and lifestyle’ says new study
07 January 2015
ANH-Intl evaluates and challenges findings and interpretation of Johns Hopkins study