The internet has frequently been compared with America’s Wild West. When it comes to sales over the Internet, or e-commerce, the comparison stems from the notion that anything goes. That might be from the best deals you can find anywhere that undercut anything on offer from conventional retail outlets, through to dubious or knock-off products. Then, of course, there’s all manner of advertising, from that which is perfectly accurate, responsible and able to be substantiated scientifically or otherwise, through to blatantly false or misleading.
The vast majority of Internet buyers know this – seemingly being prepared to accept the risks of the Wild West, a risk that’s often seen as an acceptable trade-off against the freedom the Internet offers in an otherwise increasingly regulated world.
For those reliant on natural health products, particularly ones that have been exorcised from EU markets by zealous regulators following both national and EU rules and regulations, the Internet has often been a saviour. Sometimes literally, in the life-saving sense.
The European Commission has been developing plans on how it’s going to regulate food-ag businesses – and is proposing a number of measures over the coming years to ensure tighter enforcement of EU regulations on the cyber-market.
Part of this process is the draft recommendation targeting food supplements. Could this recommendation restrict EU citizen’s access to important natural health products. We are definitely concerned it might.
The recommendation is designed to create a more cooperative approach between national authorities in the EU. But however well-intentioned it might be in its efforts to crack down on cowboy operators’ and those selling endangered species of herbs, ANH-Intl founder and executive director Rob Verkerk, suggested that “This draft recommendation from the Commission looks a lot more like it’s about Big Pharma and Big Food protection rather than consumer or endangered species protection”.
Accordingly, we’re in the process of taking our concerns to the Commission and to Members of the European Parliament.
Devil in the detail
There are a few givens: Internet sales are notoriously difficult to regulate, there’s a much higher proportion of cowboy operators selling on the Internet than through brick and mortar retail outlets, and some species of herbs are genuinely threatened by over-exploitation of wild herbs and insufficient sustainable cultivation of those species.
That makes a concerted effort to tidy up these problem areas justified. The Commission’s proposal involves a control period, expected from September through November 2017, when EU member states, on a voluntary basis, will collect and evaluate information on non-compliance with EU laws, misleading advertising and other information pertaining to food supplements. Dipping its toes in the water, the Commission has agreed, based on stakeholder concerns, to focus initially on 4 ingredients, all regarded as novel foods.
Given that each one of these ingredients or herbs are of interest to Pharma companies, either as drugs or because they compete with existing drugs, it’s more than likely the stakeholders that have aided the selection of the 4 initial ingredients are related to Big Pharma itself.
The 4 target ingredients of Big Pharma interest
Let’s briefly look at each in turn.
Agmatine is a metabolite of the essential amino acid arginine and is a neurotransmitter and neuro-modulator. It occurs naturally in tiny amounts in a range of foods, especially fermented foods, but the synthetic variant that is targeted by the EC recommendation is being used particularly in pre-workout supplements in sports nutrition as it helps create focus. It is however, being intensively researched as a drug to combat depression, but it also has great potential as a treatment for a wide range of neurological diseases including Alzheimer’s and Parkinsons.
Epimedium grandiflorum – horny goat weed – is the natural Viagra alternative. Since Pfizer’s Viagra lost patent protection, there is very strong interest in natural alternatives – and not just by Pfizer.
In terms of endangered species, Hoodia gordonii is listed on Appendix II of the CITES database, but no quotas have yet been set. There is illegal wild harvesting as well as cultivation in South Africa, Namibia and other southern African countries. There is a definite requirement for sustainable approaches to cultivation and harvest – but that can be said of a very wide variety of region-specific herbs used for health purposes.
The take-home here is that novel food regulation is being used a barrier to trade and to freedom of choice. The two big obstacles for food supplements in the EU are being classified as an unlicensed medicine, simply because the product is therapeutically active, or it being classified as an unauthorised novel food.
There is a sense that this recommendation is about protecting citizens’ health or endangered species, but the efforts that contribute to its implementation could well be diverted — inappropriately — to protecting big business.
We are currently working to make sure this isn’t another piece of EU soft law that gets diverted by business interests for their own benefit. We will keep you appraised of developments.