More and more people are turning to food supplements to support their health. Scientific evidence that they work and are safe are the two top drivers of consumer choice. Some use them as an antidote to less than perfect diets, others to protect against declining nutrient contents in food or because they can’t or choose not to eat certain foods. But turn to the media for information and you could end up seriously confused about their benefits (or otherwise) and safety.
Despite what limited studies suggest, there are literally thousands of published research papers that show supplements yield substantial benefits to very large numbers of people. There are many plausible reasons that explain how diseases and health are impacted by micronutritional deficiencies, such as the triage theory put forward by the eminent US molecular biochemist, Professor Bruce Ames.
As you’ll discover below, food supplements – being concentrated sources of nutrients delivered in dose forms – are also the safest products we consume, being many times safer than conventional foods.
It’s worth remembering that safety is a relative concept – so a tiny amount of people may be harmed from taking the wrong supplements at the wrong time. But those harms, on the occasions they occur, are considerably less common than harm caused by conventional foods. Have regulators ever suggested we stop eating that?
That’s why we’ve been protecting consumer access to supplements and fighting for therapeutic levels of nutrients for many years now and will continue to do so along with our sister organisation, ANH-USA.
As it’s #ThrowbackThursday we’ve dug deep into our archives to cut through the hype and confusion, confirm the safety of supplements and explain why supplements (and the form they take) are so essential to our health and wellbeing in today’s modern world.
A picture tells a thousand words, so they say. Today, ANH-Intl releases hard data in graphical format, from official sources, showing that food supplements are the safest substances to which we are commonly exposed – while being the target of increasingly restrictive European legislation aimed at ‘protecting consumers’. In contrast, being admitted to a UK hospital or taking prescription drugs exposes a person to one of the greatest preventable risks in society.
In fact, preventable medical injuries in UK hospitals expose you to around the same risk of death as being deployed on military service to Afghanistan – both of which are around 300,000 times greater than the risk of death from taking natural health products.
Vitamin bashing is a popular sport among those who have not studied, witnessed or experienced the benefits of taking vitamins and associated cofactors at levels over and above those found in an average diet. The words in the preceding sentence were of course carefully chosen; the ‘vitamins’ to which we refer may be naturally-occurring in foods, or they may be synthetic but associated with cofactors and other bioactive compounds and enzymes in plant foods. We also know that today’s ‘average diet’ differs greatly from that with which we evolved and typically has an imbalanced delivery of carbohydrates, fats and proteins, is too high in Omega 6 compared with Omega 3 fatty acids, and is deeply deficient in a plethora of nutrients needed to control and balance the multiple and interacting metabolic systems required to keep us healthy, vital and bounding with life.
People throughout the world are increasingly shunning mainstream medicine in favour of more natural approaches to improving their health and wellbeing. Not coincidentally, the attacks on natural healthcare continue to mount. Media attacks – such as comparisons of the food (dietary) supplement industry with an unregulated ‘Wild West’ – are only one side of the story. They reflect a wider threat from certain quarters of the scientific, regulatory and media establishments, which must be resisted at all costs.